jamesq: (Default)
[personal profile] jamesq
I don't know how they can claim it's an anti-marriage law if not a single person who can get married now will be preventing from being married after it passes.

*** [profile] nosarious-inspired update ***

They call it an anti-marriage bill, yet everyone who could get married prior to the bill can still get married after the bill. How is it anti-marriage?

er... what?

Date: 2005-04-13 01:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nosarious.livejournal.com
Your syntax is a bit skewed there, mate.

I don't know how they can claim it's an anti-marriage law if no single person who can get married now will be prevented from being married after it passes.

Just trying to be a spelling nazi...

Re: er... what?

Date: 2005-04-13 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heathertree.livejournal.com
Can't you still say "not a single person"?

brain broken, and i don't like linguistics anyhow... so never mind

Profile

jamesq: (Default)
jamesq

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 06:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios