When You Got to Go, You've Got to Go
Mar. 26th, 2010 01:58 pm[Poll #1543434]
Any thoughts on unisex bathrooms (i.e. nothing but stalls and sinks, no urinals, and the stalls have a higher degree of privacy then currently prevalent to thwart peeping toms)?
Any thoughts on unisex bathrooms (i.e. nothing but stalls and sinks, no urinals, and the stalls have a higher degree of privacy then currently prevalent to thwart peeping toms)?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 08:52 pm (UTC)I have on very very rare occasions gotten over my sense of decorum and used the men's if the men's is a closeable, one stall with no one around (let alone no one in line) or if it's a sort of special situation where the only useable toilet is the men's and everyone at the event or whatever is aware we'll all be using it. But in 99% of situations, "No way." covers my approach :-)
However, I'd be cool with unisex bathrooms. I don't want them to take over the world, since sometimes it's nice to just be away from boys, but on occasion it would be fine with me.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 10:49 pm (UTC)As for unisex bathroom. Good idea in theory, bad idea in practise. For the most part it would be fine, but there would be an increase in... questionable activities occurring in the washroom, ranging from peeping to.. well what comes naturally when a man and a woman love love each other.
The other question would be if they're willing to use them. Some people don't want the world to know that they poop. Ie, shameful shitters.
Anyhow, my two cents.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:19 am (UTC)As for the using the other gender's bathroom question - I'll do it if it's the single person bathrooms (i.e. no stalls). I don't understand why they specify gender on those sometimes... I've only once or twice used a multiple-person-style men's washroom.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:44 am (UTC)