jamesq: (Default)
[personal profile] jamesq
1) BSE is spread by bad feed procedures (grinding up dead animals and mixing the goo into the live animal's feed).

2) Bad feed procedures persist because its a cheap way to get protein into the animals.

3) A "don't do that" directive from Ottawa will never be followed by an Alberta farmer unless the farmer can make an immediate and obvious connection that it's in his best interest. Remember, these are the same people who, after a hail storm has wiped out their crops, will shake their fist at the heavens and shout "Damn you Ottawa".

4) Better than half of the feed tested (in a recent check) was in violation of the standards. Thus proving point #3.

5) R-CALF, the American rancher association, will be able to keep the border closed as long as they can convince people that Canadian cattle is unsafe.

What does all this mean? It means that we have to test every single head of cattle. This will keep the farmers honest and it's a great stick to beat R-CALF (and their counterparts in other countries) with.
"Canadian cattle isn't safe."
"Yes it is. here's proof."
Yeah, the ranchers are going to hate it (they have to change their feed practices) and yeah, the packers are going to hate it (they're going to have to administer the tests) and yeah it's going to be expensive. Suck it up, it's better than not selling any cattle at all.

Short Thoughts On Mad Cows

Date: 2005-03-02 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hey James,

Well you've sort of got it right and sort of got it bass ackwards;)


1) BSE is spread by bad feed procedures (grinding up dead animals and mixing the goo into the live animal's feed).


This is correct.

2) Bad feed procedures persist because its a cheap way to get protein into the animals.


Again correct. It is also an easy way to deal with all that pesky awful that is created by killing and bucthering in a factory.

3) A "don't do that" directive from Ottawa will never be followed by an Alberta farmer unless the farmer can make an immediate and obvious connection that it's in his best interest. Remember, these are the same people who, after a hail storm has wiped out their crops, will shake their fist at the heavens and shout "Damn you Ottawa".


This is where you go wrong. Farmers have been trying to buy feed supplements that are free of animal parts. My brother couldn't find any and eventually gave up and gets the minerals to his cattle in other less efficient and more expensive ways. Farmers were the ones who requested that Ottowa put a ban on animal parts in ruminant feeds. they knew there was a problem before the Department of Agriculture would admit it. The farthest that our illustrious leaders would go is to emplace a voluntary ban on feed producers. The kicker is that all of these contaminated mineral supplements are manufactured in guess where........the good old US of A.

4) Better than half of the feed tested (in a recent check) was in violation of the standards. Thus proving point #3.


See point #3

5) R-CALF, the American rancher association, will be able to keep the border closed as long as they can convince people that Canadian cattle is unsafe.


Farmers have been pushing for this for 18 months--6 months after the single cow was found in AB.


What does all this mean? It means that we have to test every single head of cattle. This will keep the farmers honest and it's a great stick to beat R-CALF (and their counterparts in other countries) with.
"Canadian cattle isn't safe."
"Yes it is. here's proof."
Yeah, the ranchers are going to hate it (they have to change their feed practices) and yeah, the packers are going to hate it (they're going to have to administer the tests) and yeah it's going to be expensive. Suck it up, it's better than not selling any cattle at all.


The fact is that the test is way cheaper than having your herd value decline more than 90%. Farmers know this, and have volunteered to pay for the test out of their own pockets.

Troy the farm boy

Sarry to take up so much room

Re: Short Thoughts On Mad Cows

Date: 2005-03-03 07:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Things are not always as clear as they seem when you only hear one side. It is good to get views from everyone involved.
Caethes

Re: Short Thoughts On Mad Cows

Date: 2005-03-03 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
R-CALF's activism has somewhat less than nothing to do with "safety" or any other legitimate concern. It's all about protectionism at the expense of anyone else that isn't an _American_ cattle producer. (I will point out that American slaughter/packing industry is getting its economic ass kicked)

If nothing else, this whole schmozzle should have the following effects in Canada:

1. Start ignoring NAFTA the same way that the Americans do.

2. Quit being so !#@%!##$ing dependent on the US for exports, and start fostering some relationships with _OTHER_ economies - lessee: China, India, Russia and the EU come to mind offhand.

3. Evolve our industry to our advantage.

4. Tear down inter-provincial trade barriers. (It's actually easier right now to sell to the US than it is to sell into Ontario!)

The good news is that some of the Canadian cattle industry seems to be moving in the right direction - albeit slowly. The bad news is that it has taken a 'toe-to-toe' match with the enlightened minds that inhabit various arms of the US government to get people to wake up to the reality.

(The conspiracy theorist in me has to suspect that the sudden reversal of direction south of the border is being helped along by Martin's recently published position on Missile Defense - but that's another tirade)

- Grog
http://www.crystalgaze2.blogspot.com/

Profile

jamesq: (Default)
jamesq

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 12:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios