jamesq: (Default)
[personal profile] jamesq
Well, two more actually.

When I hear the local rednecks universally holding a certain position, my knee-jerk reaction is that the opposite must be the reasonable thing to do. Hence why I'm warming up to the coalition.

Also, Alberta does itself no favours with its demonizing of the Liberals and New Democrats. It's not like you're giving them a reason to listen to you when they're in power.

Date: 2008-12-08 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oblivions.livejournal.com
Doubly so, no that we've become an environmental PR nightmare.

Date: 2008-12-08 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyroticon.livejournal.com
Coalition works just fine for me, for reasons you outlined in your previous entry. It's as likely to make for a poor government than a single party, minority or majority.

I have one question, though. How do you answer the accusation that such a government would have put "traitors to the nation" in charge? I find it a laughable claim, but wanted to hear how you'd put it.

Date: 2008-12-09 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thebrucie.livejournal.com
Isn't Cletus Gareth's bowling name?

Date: 2008-12-09 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyroticon.livejournal.com
Well put on all counts. Thank you.

Profile

jamesq: (Default)
jamesq

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios